Thorp, J. H., and D. C. Rogers (2016) Keys to
Nearctic Fauna. Thorp and Covich’s
Freshwater Invertebrates, Fourth Edition.
Volume II.
“What a marvelous contribution! I never thought I would live to see the day.”
Both these sentiments oscillated through my mind
in rapid succession as I flipped through the pages of Christopher Rogers’
“Class Gastropoda” key in the new edition of Thorp & Covich displayed on
the auction table in Raleigh [1] last June.
The taxonomy is complete, thorough, well-researched and modern. Just three genera of living pleurocerids,
check. Hubendick’s single,
broadly-inclusive genus of lymnaeids, check.
Just two genera of physids, check!
Bellamya yes, Planorbella no. Onward
as the pages turned. What a marvelous
contribution! I never thought I would
live to see the day.
This was not the first time such thoughts had
flickered through my mind, however. It
had happened twice before.
I imagine that most of my readership will be familiar
with the Thorp & Covich tradition. The
first edition of Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater
Invertebrates, as the collaboration was originally called, was published in
1991, with a second edition in 2001 and a third in 2010. Over this 20-year span Thorp & Covich has become the primary bench reference for biologists working with the (non-insect)
freshwater macrobenthic fauna of the United States [2].
Ken Brown was the solo author of the Gastropoda chapter through its first two editions, Chuck Lydeard joining him in 2010 [3]. Ken has an excellent background in freshwater
gastropod ecology, which together with anatomy, physiology and (later) gene
trees comprised the first 70% of the chapter.
The remaining 30% was allocated to a dichotomous key following the
taxonomy of Burch [4] rather closely [5], but I am not criticizing. That’s all there was.
So the first time that
“marvelous-contribution-but-it’ll-never-happen” thought flickered through my
brain was in March of 2011, when I opened an email from Jim Thorp. Jim intimated to me that, even though his
third edition was only a single year off the press, he and Christopher were
already making plans for a major revision.
He projected that his fourth edition would expand into a series of
volumes, the first of which would be dedicated to more ecological themes, the
second of which would present dichotomous keys to the Nearctic fauna, the third
to the Palaearctic, and so forth [6]. The
fourth-edition keys would be much larger and more detailed than those of the
third edition, extended down to the species level wherever possible. And he wanted me to lead the Nearctic
Gastropoda team.
I was flattered, of course. But the series of negotiations into which we
entered did not ultimately yield fruit.
I am a big fan of review and synthesis, and I greatly appreciate the
value of reference works like Thorp & Covich for biologists in the field
today. But I climb onto the shoulders of
giants with a pair of binoculars looking up, not down. An historian I am not.
So for example, of the roughly 150 nominal species
of pleurocerid snails Calvin Goodrich recognized in North American fresh waters
[7], forwarded to the present day by Burch, I should estimate that no more than
about 30 – 40 are biologically valid.
How am I to construct a dichotomous key to such a biota, I asked Jim, if
most of the taxa to be keyed are not legitimately distinguishable? Could I synonymize?
Jim (quite understandably) demurred. Christopher suggested that, in cases such as
the Pleuroceridae, I simply key down to the lowest firm taxon and drop it, with
some language to the effect that “This genus is in need of revision and
therefore identifications are left at genus level.” Well, I thought to myself, all the North
American freshwater gastropod genera are in need of revision. Most have never had a vision in the first
place. Ultimately, I found it impossible
to rationalize the expenditure of my own time and effort unless I could move
the ball forward [8].
So Volume 1 of the Fourth Edition appeared in
2015, our good friend Mark Pyron’s name appearing above that of Ken Brown as
author of Chapter 18, “Introduction to Mollusca and the Class Gastropoda.” I was pleased to see that the Pyron &
Brown contribution extended to 41 pages, up from the 30 pages of the 1991
original. And sure enough, those 41 pages
were focused entirely upon ecology and evolution, no dichotomous key anywhere
in evidence.
And the second time that “marvelous-contribution-but-it’ll-never-happen”
thought flickered through my brain was later that same year, when Christopher
emailed me to request that I review the dichotomous key he himself had prepared
for Volume 2. His draft looked excellent
– I really didn’t have a whole lot of suggestions to offer. In retrospect, I think that from among the
entire 3 x 10^8 population of the United States of America, I might have been
the worst possible choice to review a freshwater gastropod key. Because I understood what Christopher was trying
to say, and I often skipped ahead, knowing where he was trying to go.
Regarding the problematic groups, I was gratified
to see that Christopher had taken the approach he had first advocated during
our 2011 negotiations. Here’s a verbatim
quote from his section entitled Limitations:
“Particularly vexing is the strange confusion in the taxonomic literature, with many taxa accepted or rejected without explanation, and good quantitative taxonomic revisions ignored without explicit justifications. Because of this issue, the keys are taxonomically conservative, often terminating with species groups rather than species.”
The rest of the freshwater gastropods of North
America Christopher did, very bravely, key all the way down to the species
level. Among the pulmonates he
recognized 10 species of Lymnaea, 9 species of Physa, and 24 species of
(non-Helisoma, non-Carinifex, non-Menetus) planorbids [9]. All good estimates – probably pretty
close. From among the entire 3 x 10^8
population of the United States of America, I may well appreciate the effort
that Christopher must have put into this contribution the most.
So buy this volume. Actually, you should back up and buy Volume 1
if you haven’t already, as well as Volume 2.
Do it for three reasons. First,
the gastropod taxonomy is correct, complete, and current. Second, the new fourth-edition keys
complement, but in many cases are strikingly different from, the old third-edition
keys. We’ll develop that theme next
time. And finally, assuage my
guilt. In retrospect, I may have been
more a hindrance than a help to Christopher as he labored over this marvelous
contribution. I never thought I would
live to see the day.
Notes
[2] Pennak held that position when I was coming up
through the ranks, and is still an excellent reference. Nothing in the essay above is intended to
take anything away from Doug Smith’s (2001) Fourth Edition of “Pennak’s
Freshwater Invertebrates of the United States” at all.
[3] Alan
Covich and Ken Brown asked me to help with the 2010 edition. I was flattered, but ultimately declined, for
reasons similar to the ones I gave Jim Thorp in 2011. I can be a difficult person to deal with.
[4] This is a difficult work to cite. J. B. Burch's North American Freshwater
Snails was published in three different ways.
It was initially commissioned as an identification manual by the US EPA
and published by the agency in 1982. It
was also serially published in the journal Walkerana (1980, 1982, 1988) and
finally as stand-alone volume in 1989 (Malacological Publications, Hamburg,
MI).
[5] The hydrobioid subfamilies were raised to the
full family level in the third (2010) edition.
[6] Twelve volumes are now on the drawing board, according to a more recent communication I enjoyed with Jim. Volume III is now Neotropical Hexapoda, and Volume IV is the Palaearctic Fauna, which was slightly delayed. But both are currently in press.
[6] Twelve volumes are now on the drawing board, according to a more recent communication I enjoyed with Jim. Volume III is now Neotropical Hexapoda, and Volume IV is the Palaearctic Fauna, which was slightly delayed. But both are currently in press.
[8] My exact words to Jim and Christopher were,
“It’s the fourth quarter of my career. I
won’t take a knee on the ten-yard line.”
[9] Ancylid limpets integrated with the Planorbidae. OK, fine.