I've just returned from southeastern Pennsylvania, where I
have seen, with my own eyes, the most improbable invasion in the history of
malacology. I think. But before diving into the specifics, let’s
review what we know about the biology of invasive species, shall we?
Invasive species are typically adapted to exploit rich,
transient habitat patches. They
demonstrate “weedy” life history traits, for example high reproductive efforts
(relative to body mass), short generation times, and semelparity. And they also typically display special
adaptations for dispersal, such as the production of propagules capable of long
distance transport, and asexual reproduction.
All this has been a staple of the ecological literature at least since the days of Robert MacArthur’s “r and K selection” [1]. I myself developed a “USR” model of life history adaptation for my (2000) book, extending MacArthur’s two points to three, inspired by the triangular theory of J. P. Grime [2]. The most recent review of the biology of invasive species, from a malacological perspective, is that of Cowie and colleagues [3].
All this has been a staple of the ecological literature at least since the days of Robert MacArthur’s “r and K selection” [1]. I myself developed a “USR” model of life history adaptation for my (2000) book, extending MacArthur’s two points to three, inspired by the triangular theory of J. P. Grime [2]. The most recent review of the biology of invasive species, from a malacological perspective, is that of Cowie and colleagues [3].
But no matter how you slice life histories, two ways or
three, Pleurocera proxima must be the most unlikely invader in the entire North
American freshwater gastropod fauna.
Populations of P. proxima are adapted to small, isolated, softwater
streams of the southern Appalachians and upper Piedmont – harsh and poor in
nutrients, but stable and predictable.
Females demonstrate very low reproductive efforts relative to their body
mass, laying small numbers of small eggs annually, but are long-lived (perhaps
ten years?) and iteroparous.
The dispersal capability of P. proxima is so poor that
significant gene frequency differences have been documented over distances of
only a few meters [4]. Populations
simply do not move, and may not have moved for hundreds of millions of years [5]. When I first conceived of the USR model of life history evolution in
freshwater mollusks, it was P. proxima I had in mind as the archetypical “S”
species – a stress tolerator, the 180-degree opposite [6] of an “R.” It’s a cactus, not a weed.
So I was shocked – as shocked as a snail guy can be – when I
opened an email from Dr. Willy Eldridge of the Stroud Water Research Center in
December of 2010. The Stroud Lab is
located in rural Avondale, PA, on a small tributary of the Delaware River
called White Clay Creek. And attached to
Willy’s email was a photo of P. proxima.
I have dedicated much of my professional career to the study
of P. proxima [7], logging thousands of miles on the back roads of the southern
Appalachians to map its distribution.
And I knew, for an absolute fact, that the northernmost population of P.
proxima reaches a tributary of the Roanoke River just south of Lynchburg, in
central Virginia [8]. Here was a photo
of my snail – the study organism for my dissertation, the coverboy of my book –
snapped 400 km northeast of anywhere it could possibly be.
So it took me almost two years, but last month I sojourned
to Pennsylvania to see this thing which has come to pass. The population Willy showed me near the
Stroud Lab [right] does not inhabit White Clay Creek itself, but rather a
tiny tributary – a groundwater trickle – not a meter across. And Willy reported that in the last couple
years he has documented nine additional populations in similar little trickles,
extending across 20 km of southeastern Pennsylvania through three tributaries
of the Delaware – White Clay Creek, Red Clay Creek, and the Brandywine River.
My initial reaction was that it looked as though a 15 x 20
km rectangle of North Carolina had been transported three states north. If anything, Willy’s ten Pennsylvania
populations seemed even more isolated than typical P. proxima populations in
the home range. If this were North
Carolina, I would have found a population in the (main) White Clay Creek, a
couple hundred meters downstream from the trickle where the photo above was
taken. But I did not.
So Willy’s hypothesis is not that he has discovered an
artificial introduction, but that he has discovered a natural extension of the
range of P. proxima, however subsequently fragmented it may have become. Willy
thinks that the absence of the snails from White Clay Creek (and 150 km of
Maryland, and 250 km of Virginia?) may be due to road salt and other modern
perturbations and disturbances. Perhaps
harsh agricultural practices over the last couple hundred years throughout the
region? Or perhaps something bigger, over the last couple hundred million? Hmmm.
I blame the DuPonts.
Nestled in the green, rolling hills approximately 10 km east of the
Stroud Lab is Longwood Gardens, the estate of Pierre DuPont (1870-1954). DuPont purchased the 1,077-acre property in
1906 [9] and over the course of thirty years developed a lavish horticultural
complex of greenhouses, conservatories, gardens and farms, which he opened to
the public on a regular basis. And in
his will he established the Longwood Foundation Inc, a charitable organization
which continues to administer the grounds today as a public arboretum for
“exhibition, instruction, education and enjoyment.”
Longwood Gardens is especially renowned for its fountains,
pools, canals, and elaborately engineered water features. As early as 1876, DuPont was “mesmerized by
the huge display of water pumps in action at the Philadelphia Centennial
Exposition,” and in 1893 he was “astounded” by the grandiose fountains at the
Worlds Columbian Exposition in Chicago [10].
At Longwood he oversaw the construction of lavish “water gardens” which
he seems to have stocked with a variety of aquatic vegetation from around the
world. I don’t actually understand the
plumbing of the system, but I suspect that DuPont’s water works may bridge both
the Brandywine River and Red Clay Creek.
Did Pierre DuPont import aquatic vegetation, rock, or other
substrate from some stream in the southern Appalachians or upper Piedmont to
stock his elaborate water gardens? If
so, how might P. proxima have spread from a Longwood focus, even if it does
bridge the Brandywine and Red Clay systems, to the little tributary of White
Clay Creek 10 km west where I snapped Willy’s photo last week, skipping (as it
apparently has) a great many perfectly suitable little streams in between? I do not know.
But I do know that the most important predictor of success
in an invasive species is none of those I listed in the second paragraph of
this essay. Invasive species must be different. Successful invaders exploit different
resources, inhabit different habitat patches, and conduct their ecological
business in a different fashion from native species. And indeed all the successful invaders of the
modern North American freshwater gastropod fauna - Pomacea, Bellamya,
Viviparus, Bithynia, and Potamopyrgus – look strikingly different from any
element of our native community, just as Corbicula and Dreissena look
strikingly different from our native freshwater bivalves. There are no cryptic invasions [11].
All of the life history adaptations I listed in paragraph two
apply to species naturally adapted as invaders, which (as a general rule) they
are always doing, naturally. So focusing
(as we are) on artificial introductions, the most important criterion for
success becomes competitive ability – whether a potential invader is
ecologically different enough to find an “empty niche” it can exploit upon its
unexpected arrival [12]. And Pleurocera
proxima is most certainly different from any other element of the freshwater
gastropod fauna in southeastern Pennsylvania.
Or most of the world, actually.
Or perhaps Willy is right, and P. proxima is native to
southeastern Pennsylvania? And my
paragraph two is complete as it stands, and the last five paragraphs I’ve
written are wrong? Willy tells me that
he’s collecting genetic data that he expects will shed some light on this
fascinating question. We’ll keep you
posted.
Notes
[1] MacArthur, R. H. (1962)
Some generalized theorems of natural selection. PNAS (USA) 48: 1893-1897. For a modern review, see Reznick, Bryant
& Bashey (2002) r- and K-selection revisited: The role of population
regulation in life-history evolution.
Ecology 83: 1509-1520.
[2] Dillon, R. T. (2000) The Ecology of Freshwater
Molluscs. Cambridge University
Press. See especially Chapter 4 (pp
131-136) and Chapter 8 (pp 354-364). [Book site]
[3] Cowie, R. H., R. T. Dillon, D. G. Robinson & J. W.
Smith (2009) Alien non-marine snails and
slugs of priority quarantine importance in the United States: A preliminary
risk assessment. Amer. Malac. Bull. 27:
113-132. [pdf]
[4] Dillon, R.T. (1988) The
influence of minor human disturbance on biochemical variation in a population
of freshwater snails. Biological Conservation 43: 137-144 [pdf]
[6] Although Grime’s CSR model of life history
evolution in plants was (quite literally) triangular, my USR model put U in the
middle between S and R. Hence there’s a
full 180 degrees between S and R, not a mere 120.
[7] See my P. proxima page on the FWGNA site for the
(N=16!) papers my colleagues and I have published on this fascinating species over the last
35 years. [Pleurocera proxima]
[8] Setting aside the populations I myself introduced into a
tributary of the Shenandoah in 1982. See
Dillon, R.T. (1986) Inheritance of isozyme phenotype at three loci in the
freshwater snail, Goniobasis proxima: Mother-offspring analysis and an
artificial introduction. Biochemical Genetics 24: 281-290. [pdf]
[9] To be fair, the estate was originally developed as an
arboretum by John and Samual Pierce as early as 1798. By 1850 the Pierce brothers had “amassed one
of the finest collections of trees in the nation” according to Wikipedia, and
the property was already open to the public as “Pierces Park.” So I suppose the introduction of exotic fauna
(such as P. proxima) along with the flora might predate the DuPont era.
[10] I got most of this historical background from the
(really quite lovely) Longwood Gardens website.
[11] Although invaders are never cryptic under native
faunas, they are often cryptic among themselves. So there are two more-or-less cryptic species
of Asian Bellamya in North America, and two South American Pomacea, and two
Eurasian Dreissena, and two east Asian Corbicula. I think this tends to support my point, but
I’m not sure how.
[12] This is the third time I have confessed an embarrassing
predilection for the “empty niche hypothesis” on this blog. Also see:
"Invaders Great and Small" [19Sept08]
"Community Consequences of
Bellamya Invasion" [18Dec09]
Posts
